Skip to main content


What Is Non-probability Sampling? Types, Examples, and Best Practices

Learn when to apply different non-probability sampling approaches, understand their strengths and limitations, and discover tips for optimizing their use in your studies.

What Is Non-probability Sampling? Types, Examples, and Best Practices

When conducting surveys, researchers strive to obtain samples that accurately represent the larger population they wish to study. Probability sampling techniques like simple random sampling provide the most statistically valid way to achieve this. However, real-world constraints often make it difficult or impossible to use probability methods. In such cases, non-probability sampling offers a practical alternative, despite not offering the same statistical assurances.

This article covers non-probability sampling techniques like convenience, purposive, quota, and snowball sampling. Knowing the strengths, limitations, and best approaches of each method helps researchers use non-probability sampling effectively, ensuring meaningful insights while reducing risks to data validity.

What Is Non-probability Sampling?

Non-probability sampling encompasses a diverse set of techniques where research participants are selected through non-random processes. Unlike probability sampling methods that aim for statistical representativeness, non-probability sampling relies on the researcher's judgment or specific criteria to curate a sample.  

This approach is particularly valuable when the focus is on exploring unique perspectives, phenomena, or accessing hard-to-reach populations that may not be adequately captured through random selection.

Types Of Non-probability Sampling With Examples

1. Convenience Sampling

Convenience sampling involves selecting participants based on accessibility and proximity to the researcher. It's handy when time and resources are limited.

For example, a market research company posts a survey link across popular online communities and forums related to the particular product category they are studying. Members of these online communities who see the link can self-select to participate, providing a convenience sample of respondents. This allows the company to quickly collect data from a pool of readily accessible consumers interested in that product area, albeit not fully representative of the entire market. It serves as a low-cost way to rapidly gather initial insights before more extensive research.
Convenience sampling - Non-probability sampling methods
Convenience sampling includes:
  • Consecutive Sampling (also known as total enumerative sampling): Selecting all available subjects meeting criteria until the desired sample size is reached.
  • Self-Selection Sampling (also known as volunteer sampling): Participants voluntarily opt-in, as with online surveys.
While convenient, this method may not capture all views, but allows for quick, cost-effective data collection for pilot studies or exploratory research.

2. Quota Sampling

Quota sampling selects participants based on predetermined quotas or characteristics to ensure representative sampling. Researchers establish quotas, typically demographic factors like age or gender, and then recruit participants fitting these categories until each quota is met.

An example of quota sampling is a streaming video company studying subscriber viewing preferences. They set quotas for participants based on age (e.g., 200 participants aged 18-24, 300 aged 25-34, 250 aged 35-49, 150 aged 50+), gender, geographic region, and subscription plan to mirror their overall subscriber demographics. By recruiting to fill these quotas proportionately, their sample accurately represents the composition of their user base, allowing for reliable insights.
Quota sampling - Non-probability sampling methods
This method offers profound insights into population divisions through:
  • Proportional quota sampling: Uses proportional numbers to represent segments in the wider population.
  • Non-proportional quota sampling: Determines only the minimum sample size per stratum, still providing deep insights into each segment.
Dive deeper into quota sampling and its methodologies for valuable insights!

3. Snowball Sampling

Snowball sampling, also known as referral or respondent-driven sampling, is invaluable for accessing hard-to-reach or elusive populations such as homeless people, teenagers, drug users, or other hidden populations. Initial participants are recruited, who then refer others within their networks, creating a snowball effect.

For instance, researchers studying independent fashion designers/small clothing brand owners, a niche group, employ online snowball sampling. They start with a few initial participants from design communities who take an online survey. In the end, these participants provide referrals for other designers/owners. The researchers then survey those referred contacts, who provide further referrals, allowing the sample to continuously grow through referral chains within this insular community.
Snowball sampling - Non-probability sampling methods

4. Purposive Non-probability Sampling

Purposive sampling involves the intentional selection of participants based on the researcher's judgment and the study's objectives. Take, for example, a researcher studying the impacts of the 2008 financial crisis on small businesses using purposive sampling. They intentionally select 40 small business owners from various industries, regions, business sizes/ages, and demographics. The sample also includes a mix of businesses that failed and survived, as well as those that took unique strategies during the downturn. This purposive approach aims to capture diverse perspectives and rich insights into the experiences of small businesses navigating the economic crisis.
Purposive sampling - Non-probability sampling methods
Furthermore, This method encompasses several subtypes:
  • Heterogeneity Sampling: Selects participants with diverse characteristics to capture a comprehensive understanding of the population's heterogeneity.
  • Homogeneous Sampling: Focuses on selecting participants with similar traits or experiences to facilitate in-depth analysis of a specific subgroup.
  • Deviant Sampling: Targets individuals who deviate from the norm or exhibit unique characteristics, allowing researchers to explore outliers or uncommon phenomena.
  • Expert Sampling: Involves selecting participants based on their expertise or specialized knowledge in a particular domain, ensuring the sample comprises individuals with valuable insights.

When Would It Be Preferable To Use A Non-probability Sample?

Non-probability sampling methods are particularly beneficial in the following scenarios:
  • Exploratory Research: When the focus is on understanding phenomena or exploring new areas without the need for generalizability.
  • Limited Resources: When time, budget, or access to the population is constrained, non-probability sampling offers a cost-effective alternative.
  • Hard-to-Reach Populations: For studying populations that are difficult to locate or access, such as undocumented immigrants or individuals with rare conditions.
  • Pilot Studies: To test research instruments, procedures, or hypotheses before conducting larger-scale studies.
  • Qualitative Research: Non-probability sampling is often preferred in qualitative research, where the emphasis is on understanding individual perspectives and experiences rather than generalizability.

Why Do Researcher Gravitate Towards This Method?

Non-probability sampling methods offer several compelling advantages that make them a go-to choice for many research endeavors:
  • Swift and Convenient: One of the primary draws is the speed of data collection. Non-probability samples can be formed swiftly, enabling surveys to be launched, executed, and completed in shorter timeframes.
  • Cost-effectiveness: These methods minimize expenses related to participant recruitment, data collection, and analysis. Geographically concentrated samples further reduce travel costs.
  • Participant Accessibility: Non-probability sampling enables researchers to reach populations that may be difficult to access through traditional probability sampling methods, especially marginalized or hard-to-reach groups.
  • Reduced Respondent Burden: Techniques like volunteer sampling, where participants opt-in for surveys, reduce the need for follow-up efforts and persuasion of non-respondents, leading to more complete and accurate data.

What Is The Issue With Non-probability Sampling?

While offering practical advantages, this method suffers from several limitations:
  • Selection Bias: This approach relies on assumptions about the similarity between the sample and the population, which can lead to self-selection bias and inaccurate generalizations.
  • Non-coverage Bias: Some population segments may be systematically excluded from non-probability samples, resulting in non-coverage bias. For example, individuals without internet access may be left out of web panel samples.
  • Difficulty in Quality Assessment: It is challenging to evaluate the quality of a non-probability sample because the probability of selection for each unit is unknown, making it difficult to estimate sampling error and reliability accurately.
These limitations highlight the importance of careful consideration when using non-probability sampling and the need for cautious interpretation of results obtained through these methods.

Best Practices For Non-probability Sampling

To maximize the effectiveness of non-probability sampling and overcome its limitations, researchers can employ the following best practices:
  • Know Your Audience: Understanding the target population is crucial. This insight guides sample selection to ensure it accurately represents the group under study.
  • Combine Methods: Enhance sampling effectiveness by integrating various methods. For example, combine stratified and snowball sampling for diverse and comprehensive samples.
  • Use Data Analysis Techniques: Employ rigorous techniques like weighting or propensity score matching to correct biases in the sample, enhancing the validity of findings.
  • Be Transparent in Reporting: Acknowledge the limitations of non-probability sampling in research reports. Transparent reporting fosters trust and credibility in the findings.
  • Verify Your Findings: Validate results by comparing them with existing data or studies. This step enhances the reliability of conclusions drawn from the sample.
By carefully considering the advantages and disadvantages of non-probability sampling techniques and adhering to best practices, researchers can leverage these methods to gather valuable insights while mitigating potential biases and ensuring robust research outcomes.
For a deeper dive into survey sampling methods, visit to enhance your understanding of this essential aspect of market research.

Transform your approach. Let's talk research!

As the leading online data collection agency, TGM Research conducted multiple market research projects across the regions. To discover more about our research practices and methodologies...